|
The babe in the background is my creative director's concept of Jane. He's a fairly generous guy...so this is mostly likely kind. Jane has done a number of articles on the subject of on-line gambling for The Prescription. |
Life On The Gambling Web: The Flame War With Jane GameMaster,
yours truly, If I were you, and I am sure you take the good with the bad, I would think twice about having that casino on my front page. I will not delay in telling my experiences to the gambling world.
Hello, Thank you for taking the time to reply as wasted as it was. Not once did I accuse that site of cheating. I said they were in house favor, and they are. If you don't like it, get out of the reviews. I guess you only want to hear good reviews. I find your attitude unprofessional and the customer service lacking as much. My review of you in one word would be, poor. You need not reply, as far as I am concerned you and your site are already deemed unreliable and unprofessional. Freedom of speech is such a wonderful thing. Yes, freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. I'm exercising that right now. I find it amazing that you just discovered that "they were in house favor"; aren't all slots? There's nothing here for me to like or dislike and I feel no need to get out of the review business just because you lost playing at something I specifically recommended against. I listen to all reviews, but I, nor no one else, was there when you played, so we have only your word for this. What did you expect me to do, get your $$$ back? I tried to get some additional information about your experience and this is the reply I received. If you think I'm unprofessional, that's fine; you're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to mine also: you lost and you want to blame someone other than yourself. And, as soon as someone points that out to you, they are "deemed unreliable and unprofessional". LOL. Hey, go for it. If you tell the whole story, the vast majority of people who read it are going to ask you why you're surprised you lost while playing slots. Make sure that you tell them that you went there "only because of the GameMaster's review" and also tell them that my review also says "don't play the slots". You evidently think that a high rating by me guarantees that someone is going to win. All it means is that the potential for winning exists, IF one plays the games where an advantage can be gained. My web site is full of information to help you do that, but you obviously have chosen to ignore it. So, post away and let's see who laughs last. Dear pain in the butt, Dear Ms ect, Now, that is a much more professional answer than saying, well miss, your a poor black jack player and your crying in your milk because you lost. Your such an idiot for playing slots in the first place. I am surprised you did not call me a dumb blonde. I run my own web site, a very large one at that. I know how word of mouth can hurt. Your insults and unprofessional manner show yourself to be nothing more than an egotistical reviewer who gets his or her nose tweaked if they are challenged. My only regret in this unfortunate circumstance is that I took 5 moments in wasted time to write you at all. Okay, I gather what you're saying that it's all in the approach one takes when addressing another person. Alright, I buy that. Let's look at your original message: In the first place, you didn't even get the name of the casino right! Look, there are people out there who own casinos which I've basically trashed in my reviews and they respond by trying to trash those to which I've given good reviews. So, how am I to tell who you are when the message starts: " Your casino Golden Palace is a joke. How in the world you gave that casino a 90 rating is beyond me. " Do you think that warrants a reply of "Oh, thank you for writing"? You then continue: " The only reason I even went to that casino was based on your rating review." In my review, here's what I say about the slots at Global Player: Slot Machine: There is one in a quarter denomination and, while I cannot recommend playing any slot in any casino, this is very well done. As I mentioned before, you may choose to play "X" number of games and it will do it automatically for you. I ran a sequence of 100 hands at 75-cents a pop and lost $23.75 in the process and, while that's a very small sample, it implies a casino edge in the 15-20% range. Fun, though. So now I'm wondering who I'm dealing with. A person writes me, says they lost $$$ because of my review and it's obvious that either she didn't really read it, or she chose to ignore my advice. You state that I am a so called " information expert", but you went against the information I provided. That's fine; you're an adult and you may do what you want. But don't complain to me if you choose to ignore my advice and it doesn't work out for you. I go to great lengths to assist my readers who have had problems with casinos; just read my message board and the GameMaster Advisor section of the site. But, like any other human being, I respond in the way that I'm approached. In any business that depends on its readers, customers,ect. to fund the source yes I believe a nicer reply would of been in order. Maybe I did come off a bit sarcastic but it was not my intention to take it out on you. As a business you need to know that from time to time you are going to have some people not agree with you and perhaps even be dissatisfied with you. When this happens do you fuel the fire?? or do you simply try a different approach as not to loose them. One lost customer turns into hundreds, but I am sure you are fully aware of that. Yes actually I do think "thank you very much" would of been a nicer reply just for the fact that I took the time. Lets do each other a favor. I am a nice person, I am not a nut case and I am frustrated at this point with this entire situation. So lets just let it go. Thank you for writing back. sincerely
Yours for winning, ©copyright, 2000 The GameMaster Online, Inc.
Check out our Banners and Page Personalities page.
|