 |
FRONT PAGE - Back to THE ADVISOR PAGE
The GameMaster Advisor
September-November, 2002
GameMaster,
I've been moving steadily through your blackjack lessons. Since I live
about two hours from Atlantic City, I was concerned about your comments on
how they instituted negative rule changes. I decided to surf and see if I
could find any variations between the casinos. I came upon a site that
listed the different games played in AC and the rule variations. One game
this site mentioned was "double exposure". This game sounds really
intriguing. I was wondering what you think of this game and if there is a
basic and/or an advanced strategy for this game.
Thanks for a great site and all the information
Mike
Hello, Mike.
The "Double Exposure" game available at some Atlantic City casinos does,
indeed, have a proper Basic Strategy formulated for it and you can find it
in Stanford Wong's book, "Professional Blackjack". An advanced strategy
for counters is also included in there. The rules in A.C. give the casino a
0.64% edge for this game, but another Blackjack variation they offer there
is Spanish21 and that carries a 0.44% casino edge. I recently wrote an
article called "Winning at Spanish21", which is archived on the Blackjack Page of my site and it outlines a fairly comprehensive strategy for beating
the Atlantic City version of the game, so you might want to take a look at it.
I have played quite a bit of Double Exposure and it can definitely be
beaten through counting and proper play, but I would probably lean more
toward the Spanish 21 game, personally.
Yours for winning,
The GameMaster
11/10/02
GM,
In my area, the casinos play six deck shoes, with two decks cut off the back. Is it worth my time to learn to count with this situation? I don't really have the ability to travel much to get a better game. I have a bankroll of $6000 and I want to learn to play your system, but I am curious if it is going to be worth my time to complete your blackjack course.
Hello.
While that's not a great game, it appears to me that your only alternatives are to not play at all or play just Basic Strategy and lose about 0.50% of all the $$$ you bet, thus insuring that the casino will eventually get your $6000. By learning what I teach in my course, you can get at least some sort of edge (probably about 1%) over them and, while it may not make you rich, I can tell you that it's a lot more fun to win something, no matter how small, than it is to lose even one dollar. You might want to consider getting a copy of my Blackjack School DVD that shows you just how simple all this counting stuff is. The details are available at my site.
Yours for winning,
The GameMaster
11/9/02
GameMaster,
I love your tutorials, I've got the concepts down. I'm working on
speed
and accuracy of counting and memorizing of the plays that are less
obvious. I have a problem with the Basic Strategy variations. "My"
casino plays 5 decks, with the Dealer hitting on A-6. Will this cause a
change in the Basic Strategy variations? I've made flash cards for the
set on the Hit/Stand variations, but I didn't want to make any more
without knowing if there were significantly different numbers I should be
looking at. Is there a site that will generate the Basic Strategy
variations for a given set of rules? Once again, thanks for the
information in your tutorials.
Tridecem
Hello, Tridecem.
There are a few changes in the Basic Strategy for a H17 game and those
carry over to the variations, as you suspected. I am currently updating my
lessons to include them, but for the time being, the important ones are to
double A-8 vs. 6 at a count of 0 or more (consequently, that's now a B.S.
play), double 11 vs A at 0 or more (ditto) and always hit A-7 vs. Ace
instead of standing at 1.
These apply to games of 2 decks or more, so you're covered in that regard,
however I do not know of a site that will generate strategy indices like
this. I appreciate your kind words and am glad you've found my lessons to
be helpful.
Yours for winning,
The GameMaster
11/1/02
Hello GM. long-time reader, first-time writer. I'm writing to let you know of
my first experience with Video Poker and to ask you a couple of questions.
Here's the story:
I just got back from a trip to Vegas and played a lot of Jacks or Better
Video Poker. I found "Full Pay" machines at the Luxor for $1-$5. I was
using the "Simple Strategy" I printed from The Wizard of Odds
(http://www.thewizardofodds.com/game/jacksorbetter_simp.html). Anyways, the
Comp Card provided an easy mechanism to keep track of my play. At $5 per
hand, 3 hands were required to receive 2 points. By the end of the trip I
had 3000 points, which meant I had played 4500 hands. I spent other time at
the BJ table, but never presented my Comp Card, because they don't "rate"
you at the cheap tables, so I know all points were accumulated on the Video
Poker machines. My sessions were always done with $100. I would stop if I
reached $0 OR, if I cleared any $100 interval, I would stop as soon as the
money made it back down to a rounded $100 interval. This would make keeping
track of the money won/lost easier.
Total Money Bet: 4500 hands * $5/hand = $22500
Expected Return Rate: 99.46% (as per the Simple Strategy)
Expected Loss: $22500 - ($22500 * 99.46%) = $121.50
Actual Loss: $1000
Actual Return Rate: 95.56%
Here's the Major Hand Breakdown I received:
0 Royal Flush
0 Straight Flush
3 Four of a Kind
Here's a table of Probabilites for the different hands
(http://www.thewizardofodds.com/game/vidpoktables.html#jacksorbetter). If
I'm reading that right, here's how many hands (on average) you can expect to
play between each "hit" of a hand, how many I "should have" had, and the
payout that I am "owed":
Royal Flush: 1 every 38,462; 0.117 total hands expect; (0.117 - 0 received)
* $4000 = $468
Straight Flush: 1 every 9000; 0.5 total hands expected; (0.5 - 0 received)
* $250 = $125
Four of a Kind: 1 every 424; 10.61 total hands expected; (10.61 - 3
received) * $125 = $951
Obviously, I made up for all these hands with other lower paying hands, or
I'd be down close to $1700. I understand there's no such thing as 0.117
Royal or 0.5 Straight Flush, and I'm not really concerned with their
"expected payout". I was kind of shocked at how far "behind" I was in the
Four of a Kind. Is this a major anomaly? Also, in case you're wondering, I
practiced using the following Java game that would correct you if you made a
mistake (http://www.thewizardofodds.com/java/vidpok2/vidpok.html). I played
it enough that I can say I never made a mistake for the last 2-3 hours I
played it. Also, I know 4500 hands is hardly the "long run" and I haven't
lost hope. I just feel like I'm "owed". :)
I did want to let you know I'm a big fan of the mathematical/logical
approach you take to gambling. I'm sick of hearing about "betting
strategies" such as "Increase after win/loss", "Cards run hot and cold",
etc. without mathematical/simulation evidence to back it up. I usually play
BJ, but wasn't willing to bet $25/hand just to be Comped (although I might
start). I was turned on to Card Counting by your advice and practiced it a
lot and am fairly proficient. Of course, the tables at both Vegas and AC
have become tougher and tougher (more decks, little penetration, house
favored rules), making it difficult even for the Counter. What pains me is
that I've now gone to Vegas twice and AC half a dozen times (4 hours away by
car) and I've NEVER come out ahead. Prior to this last trip, I always
played BJ and counted. I know, I know... I hardly have enough play for it
to be considered the "long run". But still, you would have thought ONE time
I'd come out ahead. Meanwhile, my buddies don't play perfect or go to "less
than favorable" games and they will win. Oh well, now I'm just ranting...
I did enjoy the Video Poker, and if my real loss had been my expected loss
of $121.50, I would have been thrilled. I received approximately $200 in
Comps. If that continues, I'll be playing for free. :)
Thanks for taking the time to read this and for all the great information
you provide!
Jeff
Hello, Jeff.
Thanks for taking the time to write. I appreciate your compliments.
Receiving only three 4Ks in 4500 hands of play is unusual, but not
impossible and, since I think the casino's games are probably honest, it's
just a case of "bad luck", which was amplified by a relatively small sample
size. The 99.5% expected return is, as you undoubtedly know, a figure that
will be realized only in "the long run", so to have lost at a rate of 4.5%
isn't a surprise. In fact, it's very typical and, if you are going to
pursue Video Poker more seriously, my advice is simple: get used to
it. It's just the nature of the beast, I'm afraid. For some background on
what to expect, check out my article, "Is This Game Rigged? -Part 2", which
is in the archives of the GameMaster's Secrets page of my site.
But I'm glad to see that you're keeping accurate and detailed records of
your play, because that's very important so you'll always know where you
stand. The culprit here is "variance" which is just a fancy way of saying
that you spend a lot of time losing, then, Boom!, along comes a Royal and
you're back to even or ahead. The tough part is that we never know when
those elusive rascals are going to show up. Also bear in mind that
full-pay Jacks returns less than 100%, so you're destined to lose in the
long run, but you obviously have a good handle on how comps and cash
rebates can get that return over 100%. You have learned well, grasshopper.
It's probably the same story with your Blackjack play. You just haven't
gotten to the "long term" yet, but it will come, although you probably
don't have a very big edge over the games they deal in AC. But be patient,
because although your friends are winning now, in time the odds will get
them and you'll be on a huge winning streak that they'll talk about for years.
You're exactly correct when you say you are "owed". That's the joy of
relying upon math to play these games, rather than relying upon luck.
Yours for winning,
The GameMaster
10/17/02
GM, Thank you for all the free information your web site provides. Can you tell me when you use the true count versus the running count. My initial understanding is that you only use the running count to figure out the true count in multiple deck shoes. Is this correct or am I misunderstood? Thanks in advance!
Matt
dub2@aol.com
Hello, Matt.
The True Count "standardizes" the running count to a count per remaining deck, so that we can use the same betting schedule and Basic Strategy variations for games of any size. It's most useful for multi-deck games, but if you have a running count of 6 in a single-deck game where .25 of a deck has been dealt, the True Count is 8, not 6.
I'm glad you've found the site to be useful.
Yours for winning,
The GameMaster
10/17/02
Hi GameMaster,
I am thoroughly pleased with your blackjack school. I am only on lesson 2 and it is pretty hard work. I know that the amount of hours you study is dependent on numerous factors, but overall how many hours would it take an average user to master your program?
Hello.
Glad you found us. Welcome aboard!
Realistically, it'll take about 30 hours of reading, training and practice to get it down pretty good. This is one of those things where you never really stop learning, but it can be a lot of fun. Good luck and let me know if I can help.
Yours for winning,
The GameMaster
10/17/02
|
|