You can bet that I'll be a frequent visitor and I'm definitely going to spread the word to my buddies. I have been gambling online for just a few months and have never hit anything really good until just a few days ago... I visited William Hill Casino after reading an interview in "Gambling Online Magazine." I was on Double Bonus poker for only about 10 minutes when I was dealt 4 spades to the royal... my heart always kicks up a few beats when I'm dealt that hand... I held my AKQ10 and was fortunate enough to draw the needed Jack to complete my first online royal flush with a $4200 payout. The next day, I received an email from "The Pit Boss" congratulating me for the win...
Thanks again for the wonderful information. I applaud your efforts in making The Gamemaster Online available to the Internet Community.
Kind regards,
Paul
Dear GameMaster,
My local casino offers a 6-deck game
with about a 60-70% penetration, where players are allowed
to enter a game at any stage of the shoe, either playing
for themselves or piggybacking others' bets. The rules
are:
Double down only on 9, 10, 11
Double after split
Dealer stands on A-6
My question is a simple one. Can I turn this into
a profitable game of blackjack by using only an Ace-5
count, combined with back-counting??
Or, alternatively, what kind of edge could I gain by
back-counting, using a true count, and only entering the
game on a true count of 3 or more??
Hello, Dave.
Using the Ace-5 count as you mention would get you a slight edge over the
casino, about 0.25% which is, for all practical purposes, a break-even
game. Using the Hi/Lo count and adjusting for a True Count would get you a
long term edge of about 1.1% if you bet one unit at a count of +2 and then
scaled up to a maximum bet of 12 units, topping out at +6. That is, by
far, the best way to proceed.
You mentioned that you can use "rider" bets, that is, place your bet in the
betting square of another player, as opposed to taking a betting square of
your own. Many casinos which offer that also give the "rider" the option
of taking any extra bets like doubling or splitting pairs. For example, if
the "regular" player gets a pair of 8s, the rider does not have to put up
an extra bet for the split; s/he can just have their one bet remain on the
right-hand 8, if s/he chooses. Stanford Wong's book "Basic Blackjack"
shows you the strategy for this. In the case of a pair of 8s, the rider
does not put up an extra bet if the dealer's upcard is 2, 8, 9, 10 or Ace.
You can see that the rider now has a hand of 8 instead of a hand of 16 yet
hasn't put up more $$$ for the privilege. The downside to this is that you
should only "ride" on the hand of a player who knows the Basic Strategy for
your game.
A neat little trick to do here is go in partners with a friend who knows
Basic Strategy for your game. That person plays at the table (let's call
him or her the "caller"), perhaps flat betting $5 a hand and you just stand
and watch. When the count gets up, you place a bet in that square and then
use a special strategy which Wong calls "sacrifice" splits when it comes to
splitting pairs. (You would both use the same strategy otherwise.) For
example, if the hand dealt is a pair of 7s and the dealer has a 9 up, the
"rider" is better off if the cards are split, but an extra bet is made only
by the caller. In that way, the rider bet, which we presume to be the
larger of the two is on just the first 7 but the caller now has two bets of
$5 out. So long as the rider bet is $35 or higher, it's profitable to make
this sacrifice split. The problem with this is that pairs are the
least-frequent hands in the game, and it's a lot of info to absorb for
something which seldom happens. But, Wong calculates that the rider will
gain 0.2% by using the sacrifice strategy and the caller will lose 0.2%, so
you can see why the rider bet has to be a lot larger.
Yours for winning,
The GameMaster
10/20/2000